Allowed

Shubhang Nanabhau Idhate v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC20 Dec 2021BA/1420/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for bail was filed by an accused person in a criminal case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and Maharashtra Police Act. The High Court allowed the bail application, granting permission to execute a personal bond along with sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding residence and conduct.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant released on PR bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Shubhang Nanabhau Idhate Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

22-ba-1420-2021.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

22 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1420 OF 2021

¶4

SHUBHANG NANABHAU IDHATE VERSUS

¶5

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶6

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Karpe Rahul R.
APP for Respondent – State : Mr. V. M. Kagne

¶7

CORAM:SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
DATE: 20.12.2021

¶8

ORDER:-

¶9

.Present application has been filed by the applicant for bail under
Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶10

2. The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.684

¶11

of 2021 registered with Parner Police Station, Dist. Ahmednagar for the
offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 324, 364, 143, 147, 148,
149, 504, 506 of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(c) and 135
of Maharashtra Police Act.

¶12

3.Heard learned Advocate Mr. R. R. Karpe for the applicant and
learned APP Mr. V. M. Kagne for the respondent - State . In order to cut
short, it can be said that both of them have made submissions in support
of their respective contentions.

¶13

(1)

¶14

22-ba-1420-2021.odt

¶15

4.Perusal of the First Information Report would show that the
present applicant has been shown as accused No.10. The role assigned
to him is that he had caused injuries to the right cheek of the informant
with the help of blade. Even if the allegations are taken as it is, it will
not attract Section 307 of Indian Penal Code. Further, the police papers
though mention such kind of injury, but final injury certificate appears to
have not been collected uptill now and, therefore, whether it amounts to
offence under Section 326 of Indian Penal Code will have to be
considered by the concerned Court at the time of issuing process or
thereafter. As regards the offence under Sections 143 to 149 are
concerned, the prosecution will have to prove that there was a common
intention. Under such circumstance, when a statement is made that
some of the accused persons have been released on anticipatory bail as
well as some of them have been granted regular bail and taking into
consideration the role attributed to the applicant in the FIR, he deserves
to be released on bail. Hence, the following order :-

¶16

ORDER

¶17

I) Application stands allowed and disposed of.

¶18

II)Applicant – Shubhang s/o Nanabhau Idhate, who has been
arrested in connection with Crime No.684 of 2021 registered with

¶19

(2)

¶20

22-ba-1420-2021.odt

¶21

Parner Police Station, Dist. Ahmednagar for the offences
punishable under Sections 307, 326, 324, 364, 143, 147, 148,
149, 504, 506 of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 37(1)(c)
and 135 of Maharashtra Police Act, be released on P. R. Bond of
Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

¶22

III)The applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of village
Parner, Tq. Ahmednagar till the conclusion of trial. He should
reside elsewhere, and before submission of bail papers, the
applicant should give complete address of his proposed residence
with his mobile number to the trial Court as well as to the
investigation officer.

¶23

IV)He shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in
any manner.

¶24

V) He shall not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶25

VI) Bail before the Trial Court.

¶26

[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.]

¶27

scm

¶28

(3)

Shubhang Nanabhau Idhate v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shubhang Nanabhau Idhate v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Manga @ Mangal Kadaskar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Balaji Girmaji Warkare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Rohit Gangadhar Pandit Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Baswaraj Madhavrao Dharmaje Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Baswaraj Madhavrao Dharmaje Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Uttam Haribhau Lonkar Vs Vinod Mohan Javak and Another