The applicant in a bail application sought withdrawal of the application after the Court expressed disinclination to grant relief. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
921-ba-1054-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
921 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1054 OF 2021
RAMESH MANGA @ MANGAL KADASKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Vaishnav Megha B.
APP for Respondent No.1 – State : Mr. A. M. Phule
Advocate for Respondent No.2 (appointed) : Mr. Amey Subnis
CORAM:SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
DATE: 10.12.2021
ORDER:-
. After hearing the submissions on behalf of the applicant at length, when this Court expressed its disinclination to grant relief in favour of the applicant, learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, prays for withdrawal of the application. Applicant is allowed to withdraw the application.2. Accordingly, application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
3. Fees of the appointed Advocate is fixed at Rs.5,000/- to be paid by the High Court Legal Services Authority, Sub Committee, Aurangabad.
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.]
scm
(1)
Ramesh Manga @ Mangal Kadaskar
The State of Maharashtra
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court