A single paragraph order disposing of an anticipatory bail application where both respondents waived service of notice and the application was allowed for the reasons stated in the application.
Application disposed of; reasons mentioned in the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
931Appln29.21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
931 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2021
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1201 OF 2020
NUZHAT BEGUM W/O. IMRAN ALI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Gaurav Deshpande.
APP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. P.G. Borade.
Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. R.V. Gore.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 22.01.2021
PER COURT :
Heard.
2. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned APP waives service for
the respondent No. 1. The learned Advocate Mr. Gore waives service
for the respondent No. 2.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the learned advocate for the original informant is permitted to assist the learned
APP while deciding Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1201 of 2020.
4. Application is disposed of.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
S.P.C.
NUZHAT BEGUM W/O. IMRAN ALI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court