Tirthraj Bhaurao Hinge and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
This application granted leave for the withdrawal of anticipatory bail applications. The applications were disposed of as withdrawn by the court.
This application granted leave for the withdrawal of anticipatory bail applications. The applications were disposed of as withdrawn by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910 aba 45 21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.45 OF 2021
WITH ABA/43/2021
RAJNIKANT HIRALAL KATARIYA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant in ABA 45/2021 : Mr. Jaju Nikhil S.
Advocate for Applicant in ABA 43/2021 : Mr. Gore Ravindra Vitthal and
Bodhe Chandrakant V.
APP for Respondent : Mr. P.G. Borade.
CORAM: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE:22.01.2021.
PER COURT :
The learned advocates for the applicants, on instructions, seek leave
to withdraw the applications. Leave is granted. The Applications are
disposed of as withdrawn.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
RAJNIKANT HIRALAL KATARIYA
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court