Tarachand S/O. Dharmu Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/1372/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This is a mistaken carriage judgment. The high court bench listed a criminal appeal for final hearing but failed to record the outcome or provide reasons in the printed text provided.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
cria1372.19
¶2
( 1 )
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶4
2 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1372 OF 2019
IN APEAL/381/2018 WITH APEAL/381/2018
TARACHAND S/O. DHARMU RATHOD
¶5
VERSUS
¶6
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
¶7
Mr.Rajendra Deshmukh, Sr. Counsel for the applicant.
Ms.R.P. Gaur, APP for the respondent/State.
¶8
CORAM : SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J. DATED : 27.09.2021
¶9
PC :-
¶10
01.Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. Perused
the application. The applicant had prayed for stay to
the conviction and in alternative it is prayed that the
matter be listed for final hearing. Learned Counsel for
the applicant submits that paper book is also ready, so
this matter can be heard finally. Learned APP has no
objection for fixing early date of hearing.
¶11
02.Place the appeal for final hearing on
13.10.2021.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Tarachand S/o. Dharmu Rathod
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
Surentra P. Tavade
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court