Allowed

Rajkumar @ Bandu S/O Sahadeo Selokar v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Officer in Charge of Police Station Mohadi, Dist. Bhandara

Bombay HC4 Aug 2021APPA/315/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Misc. Criminal Appa No. 314/2021, the High Court at Nagpur allowed an application for condonation of delay in filing a criminal appeal to challenge a conviction. The 592-day delay was deemed properly explained. The court dismissed a companion application for dispensing with a certified copy of the judgment.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing criminal appeal condoned; application disposed of; appeal admitted; certified copy filing dispensed with.

Rajkumar @ Bandu S/O Sahadeo Selokar Vs the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

1. Misc.Cri.APPA No.314.21

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.314/2021

¶5

IN

¶6

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. /2021.

¶7

Rajkumar @ Bandu S/o. Sahadeo Selokar.

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State of Maharashtra

¶10

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶11

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders

¶12

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri P. H. Khobragade, Advocate for Applicant.
Shri S. M. Ghodeswar, A.P.P. for Non-applicant/State.

¶13

CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

¶14

DATE :04/08/2021.

¶15

1.Heard Shri P. H. Khobragade, learned counsel
for the applicant.

¶16

2.This is an application for condonation of delay
of 592 days in filing criminal appeal to challenge the
judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara dated 16.07.2019 in
Sessions Trial No.14/2017.

¶17

3.The applicant is in jail. Since he has not having
any means to approach this Court, the High Court
Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur has appointed
Shri P. H. Khobragade as a counsel to render him the legal
services.

¶18

4.After hearing Shri P. H. Khobragade, learned
counsel for the applicant; and Shri S. M. Ghodeswar,

¶19

¶20

1. Misc.Cri.APPA No.314.21

¶21

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the non-applicant/
State, we are satisfied that the delay is properly explained.
Hence, the criminal application is allowed.

¶22

5. Delay in filing the criminal appeal is hereby condoned. Application is disposed of.

¶23

6. Office to register appeal.

¶24

7.Shri P. H. Khobragade, learned counsel
appointed through High Court Legal Services
Sub-Committee, Nagpur, is entitled for fees for drafting
and arguing the application for delay. Hence, the fees for
the counsel appointed are at Rs.750/-.

¶25

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. /2021.

¶26

1. Heard.

¶27

2. ADMIT .

¶28

3. Shri S. M. Ghodeswar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service for the respondent/State.

¶29

4. Call for record and proceedings.

¶30

MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.2904/2021 .

¶31

This application for suspension of sentence will
be considered after the receipt of record and proceedings.

¶32

3 1. Misc.Cri.APPA No.314.21

¶33

MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.315/2021.

¶34

1.This is an application for dispensing with
certified copy of judgment.

¶35

2.The applicant is being represented by the High
Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur through the
lawyer. This Court has already called for the record and
proceedings. In that view of the matter, the application is
allowed.

¶36

3.Filing of certified copy stands dispensed with.

¶37

JUDGE

¶38

JUDGE

¶39

RGurnule

Rajkumar @ Bandu S/O Sahadeo Selokar v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Officer in Charge of Police Station Mohadi, Dist. Bhandara

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkumar @ Bandu S/O Sahadeo Selokar v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Officer in Charge of Police Station Mohadi, Dist. Bhandara

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Mubarak S/O. Abdul Gafur Teli Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Khamgaon City

Santosh S/O. Mahadeo Torkhade and Othr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Shegaon(City) and Anr.

Rahul S/O Murlidhar Sitare Vs State of Maharashtra

Pravin S/O Shrirang Yelmule Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Officer in Charge of Police Station Samudrapur, Dist. Wardha

Rajkumar @ Bandu S/O Sahadeo Selokar Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Officer in Charge of Police Station Mohadi, Dist. Bhandara

Chetan Prakash Rathod Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Khadan, Tq and Dist. Akola and Another