The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, dismissed a criminal application which was withdrawn by the applicant's counsel during the hearing on 24/08/2021.
The criminal application was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
14.Cri.APL.No.834 .21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 834/2021 Sandip S/o. Upasrao Ghode
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri A. R. Deshpande, Advocate for the Applicant.
Shri T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for Non-applicant Nos.1 & 2/State.
CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE :24/08/2021.
1.Heard Shri A. R. Deshpande, learned counsel for
the applicant in extenso.
2.When the Court was about to dismiss the
application, Shri A. R. Deshpande, the learned counsel for
the applicant submits that he wishes to withdraw the
application.
3. His statement is accepted.
4. The application is dismissed, as withdrawn.
5.Since, the learned counsel for the applicant is
withdrawing this application, the Court is not giving
detailed reasons as to why the application needs dismissal
JUDGE JUDGE
RGurnule
Sandip S/o. Upasrao Ghode
State of Maharashtra
V. M. Deshpande
Amit B. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court