Disposed

Gautam S/O. Motilal Jain and Another v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Wadgaon Road, Yavatmal and Another

Bombay HC11 Aug 2021APL/752/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur disposed of Criminal Application No.752/2018. It invited a statement regarding the charge-sheet filing date and dismissed the application, granting liberty to challenge the charge-sheet separately. The court noted the application was not heard on merits.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed with liberty to applicants to challenge the charge-sheet; no hearing on merits.

Gautam S/O. Motilal Jain and Another Vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

20.Cri.APL.No.752.18

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.752/2018

¶5

Gautam S/o. Motilal Jain and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

¶6

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders

¶7

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri S. R. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicants.
Shri S. M. Ghodeswar, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1/State.

¶8

CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

¶9

DATE:11/08/2021.

¶10

1.Shri S. M. Ghodeswar, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State invited our attention to the
paragraph No.4 of the reply filed on behalf of the State. In
the said paragraph, it is stated on oath that the
Investigating Officer after completion of the investigation
has filed the charge-sheet on 28.01.2019.

¶11

2.In view of the aforesaid statement, this
application is disposed of with a liberty to the applicants to
file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate Court
to challenge the charge-sheet if they desire so.

¶12

3.It is made clear that the case of the applicants
has not heard on its own merits by this Court.

¶13

4.The application is disposed of with liberty as

¶14

granted.

¶15

 JUDGEJUDGE

¶16

RGurnule

Gautam S/O. Motilal Jain and Another v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Wadgaon Road, Yavatmal and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gautam S/O. Motilal Jain and Another v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Wadgaon Road, Yavatmal and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyamgir S/O Kishorgir Giri and 4 Others Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps Daryapur, Distamravati

Ashok Sahebrao Lahane Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Station Officer, Lonar, Dist. Buldhana and Another

Bharat S/O Vishnu Devkar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary Home Deparment, Mantralya, Mumbai and 2 Others

Dharmpal S/O Natthuji Meshram Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Ministry of Home Mantralaya, Mumbai and Another

Surendranath @ Suresh S/O Kashinath Urkude and Another Vs State of Mah., Thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station Shirpur, Dist. Yavatmal and Another

Jaya Laxmanrao Kene Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps Dattapur, Tahsildhamangaon Railway Distamravati and Another