Chetan @ Sakhya Namdeo Shelke v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Understandably, the appellant stated willingness to withdraw the criminal appeal, resulting in its immediate disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33-apeal-1450-19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1450 OF 2019
Chetan @ Sakhya Namdeo Shelke ..Appellant. Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
..Respondents
Mr. Vivek Arote, for Appellant.
Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 07 OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the Appellant states that, he has
received instructions to withdraw the Appeal.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Digitally signed byVINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date: 2021.10.08 14:51:23 +0530
1 of 1
Gokhale
Chetan @ Sakhya Namdeo Shelke
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court