Allowed

Datta Ashok Dhawade v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC7 Sept 2021APEAL/548/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Appeal under Section 14A of the SC & ST Act treated as pre-arrest bail application. The court held that application of the Act was doubtful as alleged casteist abuses were not in public view and stalking allegations were not conceivable. Bail was allowed.

What did the court decide?

Pre-arrest bail on execution of PR bond Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties.

Datta Ashok Dhawade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN

¶2

Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Date: 2021.09.09 14:48:18 +0530

¶3

21-APEAL-548-2021.odt

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.548 OF 2021

¶6

Datta Ashok Dhawade … Appellant Vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents

¶7

Mr. Rupesh A. Zade for the Appellant. Mr. A.R.Patil, APP for the Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Shradha Sawant (Appointed) for Respondent No.2.

¶8

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : 7 th SEPTEMBER, 2021.

¶9

P.C. :

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, the

¶11

learned counsel for the complainant (appointed) and the learned Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

2 It is an appeal under Section 14A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (‘ SC & ST Ac t’ for short).

¶13

Shivgan 1/3

¶14

21-APEAL-548-2021.odt

¶15

3 Apprehending arrest in connection with the Crime No.0153 of 2021 registered with Bhigwan Police Station for the ofences punishable under Sections 354D, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC & ST Act, applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail. Primary evaluation of the First Information Report suggests alleged casteist abuses hurled by the applicant with intent to humiliate were not in “public view”, which is essential ingredient of the ofence under Section 3(1)(r),(s) of the Act. Besides, it may be stated that the allegations of “Stalking” are prima-facie, not conceivable in view of the strained relationship between the applicant and the complainant, in-as-much as the appellant’s wife contested Gram-Panchayat Elections wherein complainant had fled nomination but withdrew it subsequently.

¶16

4 In consideration of the nature of allegations, in my view, prima-facie, application of the provisions of the SC

¶17

Shivgan 2/3

¶18

21-APEAL-548-2021.odt

¶19

& ST Act are doubtful. For these reasons, appeal is allowed and hence, the following order:

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(I ) In the event of arrest, the appellant be enlarged on bail in Crime No.0153 of 2021 registered with Bhigwan Police Station on executing the PR bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like sum.

¶22

(ii) Appellant shall report to the Investigating Ofcer as and when called.

¶23

5 Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

¶25

Shivgan 3/3

Datta Ashok Dhawade v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Datta Ashok Dhawade v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shardul Jayesh Mody Vs Dhruvita Shardul Mody and Anr.

Vinod S/O. Ganeshbhai Kevadiya Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kunti Sanjay Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sagar Sudhir Sanas Vs the State of Maharashtra

Somnath @ Sonya Raghunath @ Raghuji Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Hiten Jethalal Gala and Anr. Vs Rbl Bank Ltd. and Anr.