Shardul Jayesh Mody v. Dhruvita Shardul Mody and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Revision Application seeking leave to withdraw was unconditionally withdrawn and disposed of by the Bombay High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Revision Application No. 163 / 2020
Shardul Jayesh Mody .. Applicant
Versus.
Dhruvita Shardul Mody and Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Satyaram R. Gaud, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.D. Khamkhedkar, APP for State.
CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : 06th SEPTEMBER,2021.
P.C. : -
Learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application, unconditionally. Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
Digitally signed MOHAMMAD by MOHAMMAD NAJEEB NAJEEBMOHAMMAD MOHAMMAD QAYYUM QAYYUM Date: 2021.09.06 16:36:13 +0530
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
Najeeb.. 1/1
Shardul Jayesh Mody
Dhruvita Shardul Mody and Anr.
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court