Two criminal appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the appellants, who sought leave to withdraw the appeals with a prayer that the trial be expedited. The court granted the prayer.
Trial expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.127 OF 2021
(Yogesh Shivaji Barve Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)
AND
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.188 OF 2021
(Babita Angat Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)
Mr. Chaitanya C. Deshpande , Advocate for the appellant in
Cri. Appeal No.127/2021
Mr. Sopan G. Bobde, Advocate for the appellant in
Cri. Appeal No.188/2021
Mr. R.B. Bagul, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
Smt. Shital E. Waghmare, Advocate for respondent No.2
in both appeals
CORAM :MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE :29.07.2021
PER COURT:
After hearing both the sides, when this Court expressed its
disinclination to grant bail to the appellants on merits as also since there is
no material change in circumstance since rejection of their earlier appeals
for bail, except passage of time, the learned Advocates for the appellants,
seek leave to withdraw the appeals with a prayer that the trial may be
expedited.
2.Both the Criminal Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. The
trial is expedited.
npj/CRIAPL127-2021+
[MANGESH S. PATIL]
JUDGE
2 CRIAPL127-2021+
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to expedite the trial.
Yogesh Shivaji Barve
The State of Maharashtra
Babita Angat Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court