Anticipatory Bail applications were disposed of after parties informed the court of an amicably settlement and intention to seek quashing by consent before a Division Bench. Interim protection was continued for six weeks.
Ad-interim protection in all applications continued for six weeks; applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9 ABA-919-19.doc
BDP-SPS-tac
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.919 OF 2019
Subhash Namdeorao Karad & Anr.]… Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra]… Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 871 OF 2019
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.919 OF 2019
Gopal Kantilal Kayastha]… Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Subhash Namdeorao Karad & Anr.]… Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra]… Respondent
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.922 OF 2019
Dinesh Jayantial Bhatevara]… Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra]… Respondent
1/3
9 ABA-919-19.doc
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 869 OF 2019 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.922 OF 2019
Gopal Kantilal Kayastha]… Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Dinesh Jayantial Bhatevara]… Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra]… Respondent
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.923 OF 2019
Satish Kantilal Kayasth & Anr.]… Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra]… Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 870 OF 2019 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.923 OF 2019
Gopal Kantilal Kayastha]… Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Satish Kantilal Kayasth & Anr.]… Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra]… Respondent
2/3
9 ABA-919-19.doc
Mr. Vivek Arote a/w Mr. Piyush Toshinval a/w Aashish Satpute for the Applicant in All the ABAs.
Mr. Pratik K. Kalantri, Intervener in APPPs.
Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for the State.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: JULY 17, 2021
P.C.:-
1] It is informed that parties have amicably settled the matter and will be moving for quashing by consent before Division Bench.
2] In the aforesaid backdrop, ad-interim protection in all these Applications is continued for a period of six weeks from today, so as to facilitate the complainant and applicants to move for quashing by consent.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
3/3
Subhash Namdeorao Karad & Anr.
Dinesh Jayantial Bhatevara
Satish Kantilal Kayasth & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court