In this anticipatory bail application, the court noted the police's submission that the applicant's custody is unnecessary as her direct involvement is not established, leading to the disposal of the application as infructuous.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dusane
1/2 44__ABA_512.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.512 OF 2019
.... Dr. (Mrs.) Raajul Ketan Raj Applicant
Vs.
Mr. Shirish Gupte, Senior Advocate i/by Racheeta R. Dhuru for Applicant.
Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for State. API, Pradeep Pagare, L.T. Marg Police Station, Mumbai present.
Coram : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. Date : 16th JULY, 2021
P.C.:
Applicant and Ms Kaushik learned A.P.P.
Indian Penal Code.
Dusane
2/2 44__ABA_512.2019.odt
the applicant-woman is not required as her direct involvement in the offence is not noticed. In view of above statement, since the custody of
the applicant is not required, the Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application stands disposed as infructuous given lack of necessity for custody?
Dr. (Mrs.) Raajul Ketan Raj
Inspector of Police
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
