Court permitted withdrawal of anticipatory bail application upon Investigating Officer's statement that arrest is not desired; matter disposed by withdrawal.
Anticipatory bail application allowed to be withdrawn; interim application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 813 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1649 OF 2021
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
.... Respondents
Mr. R. Sathyanarayanan for the applicant. Murtaza Najmi i/b Vinod Sharma i/b Vinod Sharma for Intervenor/Respondent No. 2.
Smt. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the State/Respondent. PI Vivek Shende Oshiwara Police Station present.
CORAM:SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 7th JULY, 2021 (Through Video Conferencing)
P.C. :
in this case. The statement is recorded and accepted.
y.s.patil
1 of 2
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
y.s.patil
2 of 2
Mehak Ashok Mirchandani
Harsha Kanaya Sewani
State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
