The applicant, who filed an anticipatory bail application, expired before the hearing. The court held the application became infructuous and disposed of it. The associated interim application was similarly disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01-aba-510-21.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 510 OF 2021
Kirti Vitthaldas Zaveri.... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.871 OF 2021
Apnaghar Housing Development &
Finance Limited. …. Intervenor
In the matter between
Kirti Vitthaldas Zaveri.... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr. Kiran Varma i/b. Rajeev Sawant and Associates for Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Pednekar, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 05th JULY, 2021
(Through Video Conferencing)
P.C. :
1.A praecipe is moved for withdrawal of this application
because, unfortunately, the applicant has expired on 07/05/2021.
Therefore, nothing survives in this application. The application is
1 of 2
Gokhale
: 2 : 01-aba-510-21.odt
disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
2.In view of disposal of main application, the interim
application does not survive and it is also disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
2 of 2
Kirti Vitthaldas Zaveri
The State of Maharashtra
Apnaghar Housing Development & Finance Limited
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court