Rajesh @ Sukka Rameshlal Tejwani v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH…
What did the court decide?
anticipatory bail application allowed on withdrawal
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
6 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.35 OF 2021
RAJESH @ SUKKA RAMESHLAL TEJWANI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Dheple Shantaram R.
APP for Respondent State: V.S.Badakh
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE :18.01.2021
P.C. :-
After hearing both the sides when this Court expressed its disinclination
to grant anticipatory bail on merits, the learned advocate for the applicant, on
instructions seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave is granted.
2. Application is dismissed of as withdrawn.
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.]
umg/
RAJESH @ SUKKA RAMESHLAL TEJWANI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court