The applicant sought leave to withdraw a criminal application. The court granted leave and disposed of the application as withdrawn, declining to grant any substantive relief.
Leave to withdraw the application was granted. The application was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
944 CrAppln 668 20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
944 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.668 OF 2020
SINDHU W/O. MACHINDRA SUSE AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Kasar Rajendra S.
APP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.S. Badakh.
CORAM: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE:15.01.2021.
PER COURT :
After hearing the arguments, when this Court expressed its
disinclination to grant any relief, the learned advocate for the applicant, on
instructions seeks leave to withdraw the application.
2. Leave is granted.
3. The Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
SINDHU W O. MACHINDRA SUSE AND ANR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
MANGESH S PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court