High Court disposed of multiple anticipatory bail applications where the investigating agency filed an affidavit stating that custody of the applicants was not required, leading the applicants to withdraw their petitions.
Applications allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of; intervention applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-ABA-29-21-&-ors.odt
1 / 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2021
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.577 OF 2021
Krushnarao Khandoji Bandal .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2021 Ramesh Shankar Wani .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 169 OF 2021 Pandurang Ramrao Randive .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.575 OF 2021 Sou. Kusum Chandrakant Deshmukh .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 74 OF 2021
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.576 OF 2021 Swati Sunil Umrani .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Nesarikar
2 / 4 25-ABA-29-21-&-ors.odt
WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 205 OF 2021 Sou. Ashwini Rajendra Thorave & Ors. .... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.574 OF 2021 Madhukar Dnyanoba Bandal .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 172 OF 2021 Ajay Pannalal Rander .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent …....
25-ABA-29-21-&-ors.odt
3 / 4
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 02nd MARCH, 2021
P.C. :
4 / 4 25-ABA-29-21-&-ors.odt
Court, is recorded. Thus, the investigating agency’s specific stand is that they do not want custody of all these Applicants for the purposes of interrogation.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Krushnarao Khandoji Bandal
Ramesh Shankar Wani
Pandurang Ramrao Randive
Sou. Kusum Chandrakant Deshmukh
Swati Sunil Umrani
Sou. Ashwini Rajendra Thorave
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
