In bail application No. 221 of 2021, the applicant sought withdrawal of the application upon the judge's expression of disinclination to grant relief.
Application allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-ba-221-21.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 221 OF 2021
Sainath Ambadas Ramkar.... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr. Siddharth Karpe i/b. Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar for Applicant.
Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 01st MARCH, 2021
P.C. :
1.After arguing for some time, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief in this application, learned counsel for
the applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this
application.
2.Permission is granted. The application is allowed to be
withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of as such.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1 of 1
Gokhale
Sainath Ambadas Ramkar
The State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court