Nagesh Pandurang Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by an accused alleged to have defrauded a victim of 80 lakhs by falsely representing connections to secure medical admissions and misappropriating the funds.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail application and the interim application were dismissed and disposed of.
What the court decided
1 / 9
3 ABA 1286-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1286 OF 2021
Nagesh Pandurang Pawar ... Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 9390 OF 2021 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1286 OF 2021
Vashdev Thakurdas Khithani ... Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Nagesh Pandurang Pawar ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Mr. Priyal Sarda, for the Applicant. Smt. J. S. Lohokare, APP for State-Respondent. Mr. Sudeep Singh, for Intervener.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable when the F.I.R. alleges deliberate fraud and misappropriation of a huge amount under Section 420, 406 and 506 IPC.
Whether the argument that the money was given for an illegal purpose (capitation fee) precludes an offence under Section 420 and 406 IPC.
Whether the delay in lodging the F.I.R. after the alleged events is sufficient to justify the granting of anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nagesh Pandurang Pawar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
SARANG V. KOTWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court