The application for anticipatory bail was withdrawn by the applicants upon the Court expressing disinclination to grant bail. Leave to withdraw was granted and the application was disposed of accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12ABA1093.20
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
12 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1093 OF 2020
VAKIL S/O. SHESHRAO RATHOD AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. A.B. Bangar.
AGP for Respondent : Mr. V.M. Kagne.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 11.01.2021
PER COURT :
After hearing the arguments when this Court expressed its
disinclination to grant anticipatory bail to either of the applicants, the
learned Advocate for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw the application.
2. Leave is granted. Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
S.P.C.
VAKIL S/O. SHESHRAO RATHOD AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court