This was a writ petition where the High Court, on the request of the petitioner's counsel, directed the respondent Divisional Joint Registrar to decide the pending revision within three months.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the pending revision within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
916WP7057.20
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
916 WRIT PETITION NO. 7057 OF 2020
SADASHIV AMBADASRAO GAYAKE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.S. Thombre.
AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 : Mrs. D.S. Jape.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 08.01.2021
PER COURT :
Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned
AGP.
2. The petition can be disposed of, as requested by the learned Advocate Mr. Thombre by simply issuing direction to the appellate authority i.e. Divisional Joint Registrar to decide the revision pending
before him.
3.The learned Divisional Joint Registrar i.e. the respondent No. 2
shall decide the revision pending before him as early as possible
within three months.
4. The Writ Petition is disposed of.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
S.P.C.
SADASHIV AMBADASRAO GAYAKE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court