Disposed

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., Rep. by Aut. Rep., Ashwin Carlos Costa., v. the State of Goa, Rep. Thr. Public Prosecutor and Anr.

Bombay HC3 Mar 2020WPCR/161/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court at Goa granted a request to withdraw the criminal writ petition with liberty to urge grounds later before the appropriate forum. The petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Leave was granted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to urge grounds at an appropriate stage.

What the court decided

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., Rep… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

1 wpcr161-19dt.03-03-20

¶2

 Santosh

¶3

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 161 OF 2019

¶4

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial
Services Ltd.

¶5

 ….. Petitioner.

¶6

 Versus

¶7

The State of Goa and another. ….. Respondents.

¶8

Mr. Vivek Rodrigues with Mr. Vithal Naik Advocates for the
Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Pravin Faldessai, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent
No.1.

¶10

Mr. C. A. Ferreira, with A. Andrade, Advocates for Respondent
No.2.

¶11

Coram : M.S. Sonak &
 Smt. M.S. Jawalkar, JJ.
 Date : 3rd March, 2020.
P.C.:-

¶12

 Mr. Rodrigues, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on the
basis of the instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Writ Petition,
with liberty to urge the grounds raised in this Petition, at the
appropriate stage, before appropriate forum.

¶13

2. Leave is granted, with liberty as prayed for.

¶14

3. The Petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid.

¶15

 Smt. M.S. Jawalkar, J. M.S. Sonak, J.

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., Rep. by Aut. Rep., Ashwin Carlos Costa., v. the State of Goa, Rep. Thr. Public Prosecutor and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., Rep. by Aut. Rep., Ashwin Carlos Costa., v. the State of Goa, Rep. Thr. Public Prosecutor and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Theresa D'Mello., Vs Deputy Director of Panchayats, Margao and 3 Ors.

Jane Theophline Bhaskar., Vs Union of India, Thr. the Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi and Anr.

Mapusa Goa Enterprises, Thr. Its Aut. Partner., Gaurav Garg., Vs State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Goa and 4 Ors.

Natalina Gonsalves., Vs Union of India, through Ministry of Home Affairs and 3 Ors.

Surinder Jindal and Anr., Vs Police Inspector, Calangute Police Station, Calangute and 2 Ors.

The Dy. Commissioner of Customs (P), Marmugoa and Anr., Vs Flemingo (Duty Free Shop) Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Authorized Rep., Prakash Methil.