Petitioner withdrew the writ petition regarding education admissions after candidature was rejected despite interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 53 OF 2020
JANE THEOPHLINE BHASKAR., ... Petitioner
Versus
UNION OF INDIA, THR. THE MINISTRY OF EARTH SCIENCES, NEW DELHI AND ANR., ... Respondents
Mr. Gaurish N. Agni with Mr. Tanmai Gawas, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. Raviraj R. Chodankar, Advocate for Respondents no.1 & 2.
Coram:M. S. SONAK & SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ.
Date:2nd March, 2020
P.C.:
Mr. Agni, the learned counsel for the petitioner on the basis of instructions from the petitioner who is present in the Court states that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this petition any further. He points out that in pursuance to the interim order made by this Court on 31.01.2020 the candidature of the petitioner was considered; however, the petitioner does not find place in the select list.
SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, J.
M. S. SONAK, J.
ss
JANE THEOPHLINE BHASKAR
UNION OF INDIA
M. S. SONAK
SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
