In WP 6514 of 2020, the Bombay High Court dispensed with entertaining the writ petition on merits, directing respondent authorities to decide the pending application within six months.
Directions given to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to decide the pending application on merits within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 914-wp-6514-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6514 OF 2020
Premchand Harichandra Athwal… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others… Respondents
… Respondents
Mr. Avinash R. Salve, Advocate for the petitioner
Mrs. G. L. Deshpande, AGP for the State
CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2020
PER COURT :-
. We are not inclined to entertain the present writ petitionon merits.
2.In case, the application filed by the petitioner is pending
with respondent Nos. 2 and 3, it is for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3
to take decision on the application on merits as per eligibility,
entitlement of the petitioner and policy in that regard, within a
period of six months from today. The writ petition is disposed of. No
costs.
[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ]
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
Premchand Harichandra Athwal
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court