Writ petition disposed of on the condition that the petitioner approaches the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. No costs awarded.
liberty to approach Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 906-wp-6354-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6354 OF 2020
Azizkhan Yusufkhan Pathan
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
… Petitioner
… Respondents
Mr. V. M. Chate, Advocate for the petitioner
Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, AGP for the State
CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2020
PER COURT :-
.Learned AGP submits that the petitioner has an alternate
remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. In light of
that the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to
avail an alternate remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative
Tribunal. All contentions are kept open. No costs.
[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ][ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
Azizkhan Yusufkhan Pathan
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court