Petitioner failed to appear on the fixed date for hearing. The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition for want of prosecution.
Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(2)WPNo.63702019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6370 OF 2019
Rajmal Amarchand Jain ...Petitioner
Versus
Mangla Murti Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the
Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 20th JANUARY 2020.
P.C.:
1 None for the petitioner.2Nobody appeared for the petitioner on 7th January
2020 and, therefore, the petition is fixed today for dismissal.
3As the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the
instant petition, it is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Raju D. Gaikwad
Gaikwad RD
1/1
Digitally signed by Raju D. Gaikwad Date: 2020.01.20 16:24:52 +0530
Rajmal Amarchand Jain
Mangla Murti Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court