The court permitted the withdrawal of the criminal application after the parties settled the matter and filed consent terms before the trial court.
Application allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate steps before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(3)APLNo.8292017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.829 OF 2017
Sanjay Pandurang Kalate...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Sandeep S. Salunkhe, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the
Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 20th JANUARY 2020.
P.C.:
1The learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions,
submits that parties have settled the matter out of the Court and
they have filed consent terms before the learned trial Court for
getting the matter before the learned trial Court disposed of.
2In this view of the matter, the learned Counsel for the
applicant seeks permission to withdraw the instant application.
3The application is allowed to be withdrawn with
liberty to take appropriate steps before the appropriate Forum.
Raju D. Gaikwad
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Digitally signed by Raju D. Gaikwad Date: 2020.01.20 16:28:25 +0530
Sanjay Pandurang Kalate
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court