Dismissed

Sangharsh Hamal Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Khamgaon, Thr. President Vijay W. Wankhade and Others v. State of Maha. Thr. Sec. Ministry of Food, Supply and Consumer Protection Dept. and Others

Bombay HC14 Jan 2020WP/6362/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the impugned Government Resolution dated 01/11/2018 had already been cancelled by the State Government before the decision.

What did the court decide?

No order passed; petitioner entitled to benefits upon cancellation of the Government Resolution.

Sangharsh Hamal Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Khamgaon… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

951-WP-6362-19

¶2

1/1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.6362 OF 2019

¶5

Sangharsh Hamal Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Khamgaon and ors.

¶6

-vs-

¶7

State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶8

Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶9

Court's or Judge's Orders.

¶10

Shri M. G. Sarda, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri D. P. Thakare, Additional Government Pleader for
respondent Nos.1 to 3.

¶11

CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND
 A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
 DATE : January 14, 2020

¶12

The Government Resolution dated 01/11/2018 which is
the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition has been
cancelled by the State Government.

¶13

In view of this the relief prayed in prayer (i) of the
petition has become infructuous. The reliefs claimed in other
prayer clauses are the consequential and no further orders need
to be passed. The petitioner would be entitled to the benefits
upon cancellation of the Government Resolution.

¶14

The writ petition is dismissed as it has become
infructuous. No costs.

¶15

 JUDGE JUDGE

¶16

Asmita

Sangharsh Hamal Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Khamgaon, Thr. President Vijay W. Wankhade and Others v. State of Maha. Thr. Sec. Ministry of Food, Supply and Consumer Protection Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangharsh Hamal Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Khamgaon, Thr. President Vijay W. Wankhade and Others v. State of Maha. Thr. Sec. Ministry of Food, Supply and Consumer Protection Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Vandanatai Dhone Nursing School, Akola through Director Dr. Sudhir S. Dhone Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary,Medical Education and Drugs Dept. and Others

Baba Caterers, through Its Proprietor, Shyam Pukharaj Aasopa Vs Commissioner Social Welfare Directorate, Pune and Another

Nathu Gangadhar Rambhad Vs the Deputy Commissioner, Dept. of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Nagpur

Sanjay Naktu Lengure Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Dept. of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Others

Sau. Nalini W/O Gajanan Gonnade Vs the Chief Officer, Bhandara Municipal Council,Bhandara

Chetan Hinglas Bharti Vs State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Amravati and 2 Others