Allowed

Chetan Hinglas Bharti v. State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Amravati and 2 Others

Bombay HC14 Jan 2020WP/243/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench permitted the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition on the ground of an alternate remedy via the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, disposing of the matter with liberty to re-agitate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to re-agitate the questions before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

Chetan Hinglas Bharti Vs State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

WP243-20

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 243/2020

¶5

(CHETAN HINGLAS BHARTIVERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS)

¶6

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

¶8

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Rugved Dhore, counsel for petitioner.

¶9

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE AND

¶10

A.S. CHANDURKAR,JJ. DATE :JANUARY 14, 2020.

¶11

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this petition as there exists an alternate remedy of
approaching the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

¶12

We permit the petitioner to withdraw this petition with
liberty as prayed for. The writ petition stands disposed of. All
questions raised in the petition are kept open.

¶13

 (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

¶14

( R.K. DESHPANDE, J. )

¶15

APTE

Chetan Hinglas Bharti v. State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Amravati and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chetan Hinglas Bharti v. State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Amravati and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Vandanatai Dhone Nursing School, Akola through Director Dr. Sudhir S. Dhone Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary,Medical Education and Drugs Dept. and Others

Baba Caterers, through Its Proprietor, Shyam Pukharaj Aasopa Vs Commissioner Social Welfare Directorate, Pune and Another

Nathu Gangadhar Rambhad Vs the Deputy Commissioner, Dept. of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Nagpur

Sanjay Naktu Lengure Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Dept. of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Others

Sau. Nalini W/O Gajanan Gonnade Vs the Chief Officer, Bhandara Municipal Council,Bhandara

Narendra S/O Kashinath Chhapparghare and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Labour and Industrial Department, Mumbai and Other