Disposed

Sanjay Madanlal Kabra v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC10 Jan 2020CA/9245/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the applicants to unconditionally withdraw the writ petition. The court recalled the Division Bench order and disposed of the civil application on the petitioner's request, making it clear that the disposal was not on merits.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of writ petition allowed on will and risk of the petitioner; previous recalling order recalled; filed restored; cases disposed of.

Sanjay Madanlal Kabra Vs the State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

C.A.9245/2019

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9245 OF 2019

¶5

IN WRIT PETITION NO. 595 OF 2007 WITH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.595 OF 2007

¶7

Sanjay s/o Madanlal Kabra

¶8

.. Applicants

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

¶11

.. Respondents

¶12

Mr A.S. Londhe, Advocate for applicants Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondents

¶13

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶14

DATE : 10.01.2020

¶15

ORAL ORDER :

¶16

Heard the learned Counsel Mr Londhe appearing for the applicant/petitioner.

¶17

At the outset, it is submitted by the learned Counsel for applicant/petitioner that though the application refers to the prayer clause (B) wherein the restoration of the petition is sought for by quashment and setting aside the order of Division Bench dated 27.2.2018, the applicant/petitioner is desirous of withdrawing the petition unconditionally. The learned Counsel then invited our attention to a communication forwarded to the Counsel duly signed by the petitioner Mr Sanjay Madanlal Kabra. The said communication is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.

¶18

In view of these facts, the order of the Division Bench dated 27.2.2018 is recalled and the petition is restored to its file. Civil Application is disposed of.

¶19

¶20

C.A.9245/2019

¶21

In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel on written instructions of the petitioner, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the petition on the will and risk of the petitioner. We further make it clear that the disposal of petition is not on merits, but is at the request of petitioner. The learned Counsel submitted before this Court that the petitioner Sanjay Madanlal Kabra is present in this Court who had instructed the learned Counsel by written instructions to withdraw the petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶22

( ANIL S. KILOR, J.)

¶23

( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

¶24

vvr

Sanjay Madanlal Kabra v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Madanlal Kabra v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Ashokrao Magar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Navnath Ashok Shirke Vs the Union of India and Others

Shaikh Zubairuddin Sk Alimuddin Vs Nandkumar Secretary the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sanjay Madanlal Kabra Vs the State of Mah and Anr.

Bibhishan Rokhade Shere and Another Vs Deepa Mudhol Mundhe the Collector Osmanabad and Another

Sapana Suryakant Wale Vs a S Ukirde