Jagruti Vijay Ghaywate and Anr. v. Nashik Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/5654/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1 2-5654.16-wp.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5654 OF 2016
Jagruti Vijay Ghaywate and another. … Petitioners. V/s. … Nashik Municipal Corporation and others. Respondents.
Mr.Girish Agarwal for the Petitioners. Ms.Sairuchita Chowdhary i/b. J.Shekhar & Co. for Respondent No.1. Mr.P.V.Nelson Rajan, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Digitally signed by Sanjay K. Sanjay K.Nanoskar Nanoskar Date: 2020.02.27 11:48:19 +0530
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 21 February 2020.
P.C. :
The Petitioner has sought a direction to the RespondentCorporation to act upon the Resolution passed by the General Body of the Municipal Corporation on 17 October 2010.
skn 2 2-5654.16-wp.doc
The Administration of the Municipal Corporation, however, relying on the law laid down by the Apex Court governing entry to the public service has not given effect to the said Resolution.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can issue a writ of mandamus to enforce an assumption in the General Body of the Municipal Corporation regarding appointment.
Jagruti Vijay Ghaywate
Nashik Municipal Corporation
Nitin Jamdar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court