Writ petition was disposed of upon the withdrawal of the same by the petitioner's counsel with no substantive ruling.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1 42-10855.15-wp.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10855 OF 2015
Mr.Nitin V. Kulkarni. V/s.
… Petitioner.
The Maharashtra Housing and Area … Development Corporation and others. Respondents.
Digitally signed by Sanjay K. Sanjay K.Nanoskar Nanoskar Date: 2020.02.26 13:36:25 +0530
Mr.Parag Tilak for the Petitioner. Mr.Kanhaiya Yadav i/b. Ms.Geeta Mulekar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 21 February 2020.
P.C. :
The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has received instructions to withdraw the petition.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Mr. Nitin V. Kulkarni
The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Corporation
Nitin Jamdar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
