In a writ petition, the petitioner requested clarification regarding a passport issuance pending inquiry. The respondent undertook to issue the passport as expeditiously as possible, specifically within two weeks of the order.
respondent undertook to issue passport within two weeks; all contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp162-20dt.02-03-20
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.162 OF 2020
Advocate Aires Rodrigues. ….. Petitioner.
Versus
Passport Officer and another.
….. Respondents.
Mr. A.F. Diniz, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Mahesh Amonkar, Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the Respondents.
Coram : M.S. Sonak &
Smt. M.S. Jawalkar, JJ. Date : 2nd March, 2020.
P.C. :-
Heard Mr. A. F. Diniz, learned Senior Advocate appearing
along with Mr. Ryan Menezs for the Petitioner and Mr. Mahesh Amonkar, learned Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the Respondents.
2 wp162-20dt.02-03-20
period of two weeks from today.
Smt. M.S. Jawalkar, J. M.S. Sonak, J.
Santosh
Passport Officer
another
M.S. Sonak
M.S. Jawalkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
