Petitioner sought leave to withdraw writ petition with liberty to move appropriate application before Trial Court. Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29-cri-wp-5251-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5251 OF 2018
Shrishail C. Gaikwad V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
… Petitioner
… Respondents
Mr. V.V. Purwant for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : MARCH 3, 2020.
P.C.
1] Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to move appropriate application before the Trial Court.
2] The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Dinesh Sherla
Shrishail C. Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
N.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
