The Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, disposed of Criminal Application (APL) No. 1820 of 2019 as infructuous.
Proceedings disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
40-APL-1820-19.doc
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1820 OF 2019
Santosh Kumar Tiwari
...Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Pranav Badheka a/w Mr.Ryan Srivastava and Mr. Niranjan Pachupate
i/b HK Law Associates for the Applicant.
Mr.Vivek Sharma for Respondent No.2.
Mr. Sooraj S. Hulke, APP for the Respondent/State.
P.I. Sonawane, Oshiwara Police Station.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI,
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE &
N. R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 3/3/2020.
P.C.:
.Mr. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 is
seeking time of two weeks to file reply.
2.However, learned APP upon instruction from investigating
officer states that investigation is over and “B” summary is being filed.
3.In view of this statement learned counsel for the applicant
submits that the application may be disposed of as infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for Respondent No. 2 is opposing the request.
5. We keep contention of the parties open. However, as
rsk
40-APL-1820-19.doc
2 / 2
investigation is completed and “B” summary is being filed, there is no point
in keeping the present matter pending.
6.Accordingly, keeping all contentions open we dispose of the
present proceedings.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Santosh Kumar Tiwari
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dharadhikari
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court