The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the refusal to correct a mutation entry in land records. The court found no infirmity in the order passed by the Additional Commissioner and the Minister.
The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-wp-5226-19
1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5226 OF 2019
Indumati Bhimrao Surwase and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Arjun Krishna Surwase and Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Priyal G. Sarda, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Ashok B. Tajane, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1A to 1E. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 to 8 / State. Ms. Ujwala Sawant i/b. Rekha Musale, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J. DATE : 24th FEBRUARY, 2020
P.C.
. The challenge in this petition is to the order passed by the Hon’ble Minister thereby confirming the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune, refusing to correct the mutation entry No.1670 in respect of land survey No.147/2 of Village Chincholikati, District Solapur.
Mamta Kale
2/3 16-wp-5226-19
aggrieved by the fact that the name of the Bhimrao and for the matter that Dattatray was deleted and the property was recorded solely in the name of Arjun. It is not necessary to go into the chronology of events prior to the Additional Commissioner passing the impugned order on 4/7/2017 which has been confirmed by the Hon’ble Minister by order dated 7/2/2018.
Mamta Kale
3/3 16-wp-5226-19
partition which has already taken place, the same does not require registration. It also transpires during the course of arguments that the part of the subject land has been acquired for the purpose of Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation during lifetime of Krishna, father of Bhimrao.
C.V. BHADANG, J.
Mamta Kale
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the refusal to correct a mutation entry under transfer of land tenancy records.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Indumati Bhimrao Surwase and Ors.
Arjun Krishna Surwase and Ors.
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
