Borivali Himkanya Chs Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar and 3 Others
Bombay HCWP/4876/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Before : Shyam C. Chandak, Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 07th January, 2020
¶2
FOR REJECTION (ORIGINAL SIDE MATTERS) :
¶3
| 47 | WPL/2602/2019 | ) ) ) |
Mr. Siddhesh Rajput I/b. Law Counsellors, Advocate for petitioners. |
|---|---|---|---|
| ) ) ) ) ) ) P.C. : |
The petitioners and/or their Advocate to remove office objections on the petition and get the same numbered and/or registered on or before 04.02.2020, failing petition to stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S.Rule 986. |
||
| 48 | WPL/2613/2019 | ) ) ) |
Mr. Vishal Tiwari I/b. Kanga and Company, Advocate for petitioner. |
| ) ) ) ) ) ) P.C. : |
The petitioner and/or his Advocate to remove office objections on the petition and get the same numbered and/or registered on or before 04.02.2020, failing petition to stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S.Rule 986. |
||
| 50 | WPL/2625/2019 | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) P.C. : |
Mr. Jaiswar Mansi I/b. Clayderman Co., Advocate for petitioners. The petitioners and/or their Advocate to remove office objections on the petition and get the same numbered and/or registered on or before 04.02.2020, failing petition to stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S.Rule 986. |
¶4
Prothonotary & Senior Master
¶5
Date : 07.01.2020
Coram
AI extract
Shyam C. Chandak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court