Manoj Pathak and Anr. v. L and T Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(14)-COMAP-1-20.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL APPEAL (L) NO.1 OF 2020 IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1315 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2020
Manoj Pathak & Anr. ..Appellants Versus L & T Finance Limited ..Respondent
Mr. Ashish Kamat a/w Ms. Neeta Parikh, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. Akash Rebello a/w Mr. Nishant Gautam, Mr. Nadeem Shama & Ms. Hubab Sayyed i/by Triumph Legal, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 7th JANUARY, 2020
P.C.
1] Impugned order dated 2nd December 2019 is an adinterim order and thus counsel for the Appellants does not press the Appeal challenging the said order but wants it observed by the Division Bench that the learned Single would decide the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in light of the pleadings of the parties and uninfluenced by the prima-facie observations recorded in the impugned order for the reason the same are sans response filed by the Appellant.
BGP. 1 of 2
(14)-COMAP-1-20.doc .
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manoj Pathak & Anr.
- respondent
L & T Finance Limited
Coram
Pradeep Nandrajog
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court