Disposed

Ku. Chhaya D/O Damodhar Aher v. the State of Maharashra through Secretary Tribal Welfare Dept. and Others

Bombay HC14 Jan 2020WP/249/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner allowed to approach Scrutiny Committee with fresh caste certificate. Court held Committee must decide claim on merits and cannot reject it based on prior rejection.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to approach Scrutiny Committee and tender fresh caste certificate; Committee directed to decide claim on merits without rejecting based on earlier rejection.

Ku. Chhaya D/O Damodhar Aher Vs the State of Maharashra… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

925-WP-249-20

¶2

1/1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.249 OF 2020

¶5

Chhaya d/o Damodhar Aher, Shegaon, Dist. Buldana

¶6

-vs-

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and

¶8

ors.

¶9

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, Office Memoranda of

¶10

Coram, appearances, Court's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶11

Court's or Judge's Orders.

¶12

Shri G. G. Mishra, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri N. R. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for
respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶13

CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND
 A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
 DATE : January 14, 2020

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that fresh
caste certificate dated 10/01/2020 has been issued in the name
of the petitioner by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate in Form-C. In
view of this and as per the earlier order dated 30/06/2016
passed by the Scrutiny Committee, the petitioner can get such
certificate scrutinized for issuance of validity certificate.

¶15

In view of above, we permit the petitioner to approach
the Scrutiny Committee and tender such certificate before it.
The Scrutiny Committee shall decide the caste-claim of the
petitioner on merits in accordance with law and shall not reject
the claim on the ground that on earlier occasion that is on
30/06/2016 the claim of the petitioner was rejected.

¶16

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶17

 JUDGE

¶18

JUDGE

¶19

Asmita

Ku. Chhaya D/O Damodhar Aher v. the State of Maharashra through Secretary Tribal Welfare Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Chhaya D/O Damodhar Aher v. the State of Maharashra through Secretary Tribal Welfare Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Vandanatai Dhone Nursing School, Akola through Director Dr. Sudhir S. Dhone Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary,Medical Education and Drugs Dept. and Others

Baba Caterers, through Its Proprietor, Shyam Pukharaj Aasopa Vs Commissioner Social Welfare Directorate, Pune and Another

Nathu Gangadhar Rambhad Vs the Deputy Commissioner, Dept. of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Nagpur

Sanjay Naktu Lengure Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Dept. of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Others

Sau. Nalini W/O Gajanan Gonnade Vs the Chief Officer, Bhandara Municipal Council,Bhandara

Chetan Hinglas Bharti Vs State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Amravati and 2 Others