The High Court granted one week to supply a spare copy for service on respondent No.2. Non-supply within time would result in dismissal of the petition.
One week time granted to supply spare copy for service on respondent No.2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(33)WPNo.23082017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2308 OF 2017
Bhagyashri Avinash Shirole...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr....Respondents
Ms.Nidhi Bangera i/b. Mr.Bhoja N. Poojari, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the
Respondent No.1/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 24th JANUARY 2020.
P.C.:
1Despite Order of issuance of notice dated 29th January
2018, even after lapse of of a period of about one year, spare copy
meant for effecting service on respondent No.2 is not supplied.
2As a last chance one week time is granted for supplying
the spare copy meant for effecting service on respondent No.2 is
granted.
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(33)WPNo.23082017.doc
3If the spare copy is not supplied within the prescribed
time, this petition shall be dismissed without reference to the
Court.
4If the spare copy is so supplied within prescribed time,
then issue notice to respondent No.2 making it returnable six
weeks thereafter.
Raju D. Gaikwad
Digitally signed by Raju D. Gaikwad Date: 2020.01.27 15:13:58 +0530
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Bhagyashri Avinash Shirole
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court