The High Court of Bombay dismissed the criminal appeal, holding that the trial had proceeded and there was no interference warranted in the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(3)APLNo.2432018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2018
Dairy Chem Corporation & Anr....Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr....Respondents
Mr.Yash Jain with Pratyush Ranjan i/b. Halai & Co, Advocate for
the Applicants.
Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the
Respondent No.1/State.
Mr.Girish Thanvi, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 24th JANUARY 2020.
P.C.:
1It is seen from the submissions of the parties that trial
has proceeded and, as such, there is nothing worth to interfere in
the impugned Order.
2In this view of the matter, the application is disposed
of.
Raju D. Gaikwad
Gaikwad RD
1/1
Digitally signed by Raju D. Gaikwad Date: 2020.01.27 13:44:15 +0530
Dairy Chem Corporation & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A.M.Badar J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court