The High Court directed the Education Officer to decide the petitioner's pending proposal for transfer from unaided to aided status within six months in accordance with law, disposing of the writ petition.
Directed Education Officer to decide transfer proposal within six months; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
19 WRIT PETITION NO.174 OF 2020
ANUSAYA TEJERAO BHUJBALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Panpatte V. S.
AGP for Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. G.L. Deshpande.
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE:07/01/2020
PER COURT :
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
proposal seeking approval to the transfer of petitioner from unaided to
aided is pending since April 2019.
2.In case, the proposal seeking approval to the transfer of
petitioner ( page 23) from unaided to aided is pending with the
Education Officer, then the Education Officer shall take decision upon
it, on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and
preferable within a period of six months from today.
3. The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. )
mkd
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Education Officer must decide pending transfer proposal from unaided to aided within six months.
ANUSAYA TEJERAO BHUJBALE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court