Writ petition dismissed. Court declined to entertain the petition and directed the petitioner to approach a committee constituted under a government circular dated 13.02.201.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 108.20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 108 OF 2020
SUSHILABAI BALASAHEB MAGAR THROUGH NEXT FRIEND
BALASAHEB YADAVRAO MAGAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner :
Mr. Thombre Chandrakant V.
AGP for Respondents : Mr. S. B. Narwade
...
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE:06th JANUARY, 2020
PER COURT:
1.We are not inclined to entertain the
petition. The petitioner may approach the
committeeconstitutedunderCircular
dated 13.02.2015.
2. Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
SUSHILABAI BALASAHEB MAGAR THROUGH NEXT FRIEND BALASAHEB YADAVRAO MAGAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court