Allowed

Rajashree Sangappa Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Mar 2020WP/13316/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment allowed two writ petitions challenging rejection of teacher absorption approval. The court quashed orders based on a 2016 Government Resolution, holding that the rule prohibiting absorption does not apply when moving between un-aided and aided schools under the same management, relying on a prior Division Bench decision.

What did the court decide?

Orders rejecting absorption approval quashed; Education Officer directed to consider claims ignoring the 2016 Resolution and fix scope within two months.

Rajashree Sangappa Jadhav Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

10-wp-13316-2017.doc

¶2

Shailaja

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.13316 OF 2017

¶6

Rajashree Sangappa Jadhav ] Petitioner Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and others. ] Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO.13051 OF 2017

¶10

Shailaja Laxman Mahajan ] Petitioner Vs.

¶11

The State of Maharashtra and others. ] Respondents

¶12

…..

¶13

Mr. S.D. Thokade, for Petitioners in both the Petitions.

¶14

Mr. Vikas Mali, A.G.P, for Respondent-State in both the Petitions.

¶15

Mr. A.S. Kulkarni, for Respondent No.3 in W.P. No.13316 of 2017 and Respondent No.2 in W.P. No.13051 of 2017.

¶16

….

¶17

CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE &

¶18

PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.J.

¶19

DATE: 11^th MARCH, 2020.

¶20

P.C:

¶21

Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of

¶22

learned Counsel appearing for the parties, Petitions are taken up for final hearing.

¶23

1/3

¶24

10-wp-13316-2017.doc

¶25

It is not in dispute that the controversy in these Petitions is covered by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court rendered on 25^th April, 2019 in Writ Petition No.5313 of 2017 and other connected matters. The issue decided is that the Government Resolution dated 28^th June, 2016 regarding absorption of the surplus teachers does not apply to absorption of teachers from un-aided School to aided School run by the same Management.

¶26

In Writ Petition No.13316 of 2017, the petitioner is found to be a senior-most teacher working in an un-aided School and appointed against the post reserved for Scheduled Caste category.

¶27

In Writ Petition No.13051 of 2017, the person from open category is the senior-most. Both these persons are transferred to the aided School run by the same management. Rejection of the approval is only on the ground that as per the Government Resolution dated 28^th June, 2016, the absorption is not permissible.

¶28

2/3

¶29

10-wp-13316-2017.doc

¶30

In view of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court referred to above, the orders impugned cannot be sustained. It will have to be quashed and set aside.

¶31

With the result, Writ Petitions are allowed. Orders dated 1^st March, 2017 and 26^th September, 2017 passed by Education Ofcer (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur are hereby quashed and set aside. Education Ofcer is directed to consider claims of the Petitioners in accordance with law by ignoring the Government Resolution dated 28^th June, 2016 and pass an appropriate order. Along with decision of grant of approval, the appropriate decision shall be taken in respect of salary. Salary if payable shall be released within two months from the date of the decision.

¶32

[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [R. K. DESHPANDE, J.]

¶33

3/3

Rajashree Sangappa Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajashree Sangappa Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shukla Rameshchandra S. Vs Somaiya Education Trust and 4 Ors.

Balbharti Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Francis Chettiar and Anr. Vs St. Xavier'S Technical Institute and 3 Ors.

Smt. Asawari Arvind Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, School Edu. Dept. and Ors.

Shri. Umesh Laxmanrao Gaikwad and Anr. Vs the Asst. Commissioner, Social Welfare Office, Solapur and Ors.

Shri. Uday Tulshidas Shelar Vs the Asst. Commissioner, Social Welfare Office, Solapur and Ors.