The High Court at Bombay dismissed a writ petition filed by Balbharati, holding that there was no reason to entertain the matter at this stage, leaving questions open before the Grievance Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
53-WP-3069-19=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3069 OF 2019
Balbharati
.. Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. Sushil Upadhyay i/b A.M. Sarogi for the petitioner Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for respondent State
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.J.
DATED : 9th MARCH, 2020
P.C.
at this stage.
1 of 2
53-WP-3069-19=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
(PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (R.K. DESHPANDE, J.)
2 of 2
Balbharati
The State of Maharashtra
R.K. Deshpande
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
