Disposed

Akhil Maharashtra Gramin Shikshan Vikas Mandal Aurangabad through Its President v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC27 Jan 2020WP/1206/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of two winding up writ petitions filed by a society seeking affiliation. Relying on the judgment in connected Writ Petition No. 8886 of 2018, the Court directed the Board to consider a fresh application for affiliation for the academic year 2020-2021 within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Board to consider a fresh application for affiliation for the academic year 2020-2021 within three months on merits after inspection.

Akhil Maharashtra Gramin Shikshan Vikas Mandal… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

1 146-WP1150-2020.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1150 OF 2020

¶4

Akhil Maharashtra Gramin Shikshan Vikas
Mandal, Aurangabad Through its President

¶5

.. Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and others

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1206 OF 2020

¶10

Akhil Maharashtra Gramin Shikshan Vikas
Mandal, Aurangabad Through its President

¶11

.. Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State of Maharashtra and others

¶14

.. Respondents

¶15

Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. N. B. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.

¶16

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

¶17

 DATED : 27th JANUARY, 2020.

¶18

PER COURT:-

¶19

.Mr. Thombre, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned

¶20

A.G.P. for respondent No. 1 and Mr. Narwadkar, learned counsel for
respondent No. 2 submits that the petitioner-society is similarly

¶21

situated as the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 8886 of 2018 with
connected Writ Petitions decided under the judgment and order dated

¶22

05.11.2018.

¶23

1 of 2

¶24

2 146-WP1150-2020.odt

¶25

2. In the light of that, we follow the same course.

¶26

3. The board may consider the application of the petitioners for

¶27

grant of affiliation. The petitioners shall make fresh application for
affiliation for the academic year 2020-2021. The Board may conduct
the inspection and may take decision on the application of the
petitioners for affiliation on its own merits considering all relevant
aspects of the matter within a period of three months. In case the
decision is taken in favour of the petitioners by the respondent then
that will enure to the benefit of the petitioners for the next academic
year 2020-2021 as may be permissible according to the perspective
plan.

¶28

4. Writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶29

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶30

P.S.B.

¶31

2 of 2

Akhil Maharashtra Gramin Shikshan Vikas Mandal Aurangabad through Its President v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhil Maharashtra Gramin Shikshan Vikas Mandal Aurangabad through Its President v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Pravin Metal Works and Others Vs the Union of India and Others

Dhanraj Navalrai Rizwani and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sandeep Dnyanoba Patil and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sachin Nagnath Girewad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Ashok Natha Andhale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bharat Dhanraj Rizwani Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others