The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed a writ petition regarding a license withdrawal on the petitioner's request, marking it as withdrawn without costs.
Writ petition withdrawn; civil applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 123-WP13645-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.13645 OF 2019
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15251 OF 2019
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 722 OF 2020
Bharat Dhanraj Rizwani
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. V. C. Patil Ashtekar, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 27th JANUARY, 2020.
PER COURT:-
. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the licence isalready issued to the petitioner on 08.01.2020.
2. In view of that, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
3. Writ petition, as such is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
4. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, civil applications also
stand disposed of. No costs.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Bharat Dhanraj Rizwani
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court