The High Court at Aurangabad numbered a writ petition and a civil application for intervention as filed by petitioners and applicant respectively. Based on the AGP's submission regarding a pending appeal, the court disposed of the writ petition and application without granting costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 33-WP106-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2020
Dnyandeo Dattatraya Pandule and others
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Petitioners
.. Respondents
Mr. N. V. Gaware, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. S. P. Tiwari, AGP for Respondents-State.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 662 OF 2020
Prakash Bhimrao Karale.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.. Respondents
Mr. K. J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. S. P. Tiwari, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 06th JANUARY, 2020.
PER COURT:-
.The learned AGP on instructions submits that respondent No. 2
would hear the parties before it in the appeal filed by the petitioners on
07.01.2020.
2.In view of the said statement, the writ petition and civil
application for intervention stands disposed of. No costs.
( MANGESH S. PATIL )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Dnyandeo Dattatraya Pandule and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
Prakash Bhimrao Karale
MANGESH S. PATIL
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court